PARTISIPASI KOMUNITAS MASYARAKAT LOKAL PADA PROGRAM LINGKUNGAN HIDUP DI INDONESIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31595/inf.v8i1.2971Keywords:
pemangku kepentingan, scenario planning, lingkungan hidup, partisipasi, komunitas lokalAbstract
Isu lingkungan hidup berkembang sejalan dengan pertumbuhan manusia dan aktivitas manusia sehari-hari. Pelibatan pemangku kepentingan penting dalam rangka memberikan dampak pada keputusan yang diambil dan memberikan outcomes bagi komunitas atau masyarakat itu sendiri, salah satunya melalui metode scenario planning. Penelitian ini bertujuan melakukan reviu dan mengidentifikasi praktik pelibatan pemangku kepentingan pada scenario planning lingkungan hidup di Indonesia. Metode penelitian menggunakan analisis secara sistematis pada sampel sebanyak 12 jurnal terpilih. Hasilnya yaitu pertama, pelibatan seluruh pihak di Indonesia seperti pemerintah, dunia usaha, pakar, filantropi, dan komunitas masyarakat lokal diperlukan dalam rangka upaya menjaga kualitas lingkungan hidup. Konsep partisipasi pemangku kepentingan melalui komunitas masyarakat lokal merupakan hal penting dalam program lingkungan hidup di Indonesia. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ini, 75 persen hasil analisis artikel menyertakan peran komunitas masyarakat lokal pada program atau proyek lingkungan hidup di Indonesia. Hasil kedua, metode pelibatan pemangku kepentingan di Indonesia antara lain melalui workshop atau Focus Group Discussion, survei, interviu, dan pendampingan.
References
Afriyanti, D., Hein, L., Kroeze, C., Zuhdi, M., & Saad, A. (2019). Scenarios for withdrawal of oil palm plantations from peatlands in Jambi Province, Sumatra, Indonesia. Regional Environmental Change, 19(4), 1201–1215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1452-1
Andersen, P. D., Hansen, M., & Selin, C. (2021). Stakeholder inclusion in scenario planning—A review of European projects. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 169(March), 120802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.120802
Boland, A., Cherry, M. G., & Dicson, R. (2017). Doing A Systematic Review: A Student’s Guide 2nd Edition. In SAGE.
Brainard, J., Hammer, C. C., Bouzid, M., & Hunter, P. R. (2019). Emerging pathogens and deliberate attacks on European water supplies: A scenario planning workshop. Journal of Water and Health, 17(3), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2019.248
Bryson, J. M. (2007). What to do when Stakeholders matter Analysis Techniques. Public Management Review, 9037(2004), 20–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030410001675722
Cai, Z., Wang, B., Cong, C., & Cvetkovic, V. (2020). Spatial dynamic modelling for urban scenario planning: A case study of Nanjing, China.
Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 47(8), 1380–1396. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808320934818
Capra, F. (2019). The Turning Point. Mata Bangsa.
Chen, T. Y., & Huang, C. J. (2019). A two-tier scenario planning model of environmental sustainability policy in Taiwan. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(8), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11082336
Faysse, N., Sellika, I. E., Rinaudo, J. D., & Errahj, M. (2018). Participatory scenario planning for sustainable irrigated agriculture when actors seldom communicate: an experiment in Morocco. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 34(6), 982–1000. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2017.1322500
Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2012). An introduction to systematic reviews / David Gough, Sandy Oliver, James Thomas. In SAGE Publications Ltd. https://b-ok.asia/book/2718381/a08a63
Gunawan, J. (2015). Corporate social disclosures in Indonesia: Stakeholders’ influence and motivation. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(3), 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-04-2014-0048
Jain, T., Aguilera, R. V, & Jamali, D. (2016). Corporate Stakeholder Orientation in an Emerging Country Context: A Longitudinal Cross Industry Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3074-1
Keraf, S. A. (2014). Filsafat Lingkungan Hidup. PT Kanisius.
König, H. J., Schuler, J., Suarma, U., McNeill, D., Imbernon, J., Damayanti, F., Aini, S. D., Uthes, S., Sartohadi, J., Helming, K., & Morris, J. (2010). Assessing the impact of land use policy on urban-rural sustainability using the FoPIA approach in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Sustainability, 2(7), 1991–2009. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2071991
Kusnandar, K., van Kooten, O., & Brazier, F. M. (2019). Empowering through reflection: participatory design of change in agricultural chains in Indonesia by local stakeholders. Cogent Food and Agriculture, 5(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311932.2019.1608685
Lidon, B., Lopez, J. M., Sosiawan, H., Kartiwa, B., Triomphe, B., Jamin, J. Y., Farolfi, S., Bourgeois, R., & Becu, N. (2018). Approach and impact of a participatory process for the reorganization of irrigation management: A case study in Indonesia. Cahiers Agricultures, 27(2). https://doi.org/10.1051/cagri/2018015
Martínez, J., Piersol, C. V., Holloway, S., Terhorst, L., & Leland, N. E. (2021). Evaluating Stakeholder Engagement: Stakeholder-Centric Instrumentation Process (SCIP). Western Journal of Nursing Research, 43(10), 949–961. https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459211004274
Mirti, A. V., & Hawken, S. (2020). Using Scenario Planning To Enhance Coastal Resilience To Climate Change: Community Futures In The Estuarine Landscapes Of Brisbane Water, Central Coast, Australia. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 6, 51–58. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-VI-3-W1-2020-51-2020
Mohamed, A., Yousef, F., Chatti, M. A., Wosnitza, M., & Schroeder, U. (2015). A Cluster Analysis of MOOC Stakeholder Perspectives. January.
Okazaki, S., Plangger, K., Roulet, T., & Menéndez, H. D. (2020). Assessing stakeholder network engagement. European Journal of Marketing, 55(5), 1359–1384. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-12-2018-0842
Peggy, D. V., & Brønn, S. (2013). Reputation, Responsibility, and Stakeholder Support in Scandinavian Firms: A Comparative Analysis. 123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-013-1673-7
Priatmoko, S., Kabil, M., Purwoko, Y., & Dávid, L. D. (2021). Rethinking sustainable community-based tourism: A villager’s point of view and case study in Pampang Village, Indonesia. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063245
Purnomo, H., Achdiawan, R., Shantiko, B., Amin, S. M., Irawati, R. H., Melati, & Wardell, D. A. (2016). Multi-Stakeholder Processes to Strengthen Policies for Small and Medium-Scale Forestry Enterprises in Indonesia. International Forestry Review, 18(4), 485–501. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554816820127596
Rambu Ngana, F., & Eka Karyawati, A. A. I. N. (2021). Scenario modelling as planning evidence to improve access to emergency obstetric care in eastern Indonesia. PloS One, 16(6), e0251869. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251869
Rustinsyah, R., & Prasetyo, R. A. (2019). Stakeholder engagement in a water user association for agricultural irrigation management in the villages in Indonesia. Journal of Water and Land Development, 40(1), 181–191. https://doi.org/10.2478/jwld-2019-0020
Safitri, S., Sumarto, I., Riqqi, A., Deliar, A., Norvyani, D. A., & Taradini, J. (2020). Suitability model using support vector machine for land use planning scenarios in Java Island, Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 500(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/500/1/012051
Schumacher, E. . (2010). Small is Beautiful. In HarperCollins.
Storper, M. (2005). Society , Community , and Economic Development (Vol. 39, Issue 4, pp. 30–57). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02686164
Taylor, J. (2011). Factors Influencing The Use Of Performance Information For Decision Making In Australian State Agencies. 89(4), 1316–1334. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02008.x
Vita, G. De, & Lagoke, O. (2015). Nigerian oil and gas industry local content development: A stakeholder analysis. Lcd. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076715581635
Ward, C., Stringer, L. C., Warren-Thomas, E., Agus, F., Hamer, K., Pettorelli, N., Hariyadi, B., Hodgson, J., Kartika, W. D., Lucey, J., McClean, C., Nurida, N. L., Saad, A., & Hill, J. K. (2020). Wading through the swamp: what does tropical peatland restoration mean to national-level stakeholders in Indonesia? Restoration Ecology, 28(4), 817–827. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13133
Wijaya, A., Glasbergen, P., Leroy, P., & Darmastuti, A. (2018). Governance challenges of cocoa partnership projects in Indonesia: seeking synergy in multi-stakeholder arrangements for sustainable agriculture. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(1), 129–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9874-8
Willetts, J., Mills, F., & Al’Afghani, M. (2020). Sustaining Community-Scale Sanitation Services: Co-management by Local Government and Low-Income Communities in Indonesia. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 8(July), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2020.00098
Yudha, S. W., & Tjahjono, B. (2019). Stakeholder mapping and analysis of the renewable energy industry in Indonesia. Energies, 12(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12040602
Yudha, S. W., Tjahjono, B., & Kolios, A. (2018). A PESTLE policy mapping and stakeholder analysis of Indonesia’s fossil fuel energy industry. Energies, 11(5), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051272
Yudha, S. W., Tjahjono, B., & Longhurst, P. (2021). Stakeholders’ Recount on the Dynamics of Indonesia’s Renewable Energy Sector. Energies MDPI.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Citation Check
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Solichah Ratnasari, Raldi Hendro Koestoer
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
