FUNGSI PASAR SEBAGAI KATALISATOR DALAM UPAYA RECOVERY PASCA KONFLIK SOSIAL : SUATU KAJIAN LITERATUR

Authors

  • Alfrojems Alfrojems Universitas Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31595/inf.v11i1.3385

Abstract

Development and conflict are two distinct yet interrelated elements within society. Although development is generally associated with positive progress, the process can also generate negative consequences in the form of social conflict. Conversely, social conflict may trigger responses that promote further development, particularly in addressing inequalities or systemic issues. Post-conflict recovery efforts are therefore essential. Several key aspects can accelerate these efforts, including security and basic needs, economic recovery, social cohesion and justice, governance and legal frameworks, and community empowerment. Furthermore, markets can be defined in two categories: traditional markets and modern markets. Accordingly, this study aims to examine the function of markets as catalysts in post-conflict social recovery efforts, both in traditional and modern contexts. This research employs a literature review method. The findings indicate that markets function as catalysts in post-conflict recovery efforts, both in traditional and modern contexts. This is attributed to several key functions of markets, including their roles as gathering spaces for diverse visitors, venues for communication with various interaction styles, sites of trade and economic exchange, platforms for community empowerment, centers of economic activity, and arenas for social contribution.

 

 

Keywords: Traditional Market, Modern Market, Social Conflict, Mitigation, Curative, and Catalyst

Author Biography

Alfrojems Alfrojems, Universitas Indonesia

Mahasiswa Universitas Indonesia

References

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2024). Statistik Konflik Sosial di Indonesia 2023–2024. Jakarta: BPS.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative Justice and Responsive Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Bruce, H. (2009). Contextual Factor in Assessing Children And Adolescent. In T. Kaplan (Ed.), Children And Adolescents With Mental Health Problem. RCPsych Publication.

Burton, J. (1990). Conflict: Resolution and Provention. London: Macmillan.

Chambers, R. (1997). Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

Chambers, R. (1997). Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. London: Intermediate Technology Publications.

Colletta, N. J., & Cullen, M. L. (2000). The Nexus Between Violent Conflict, Social Capital and Social Cohesion: Case Studies from Cambodia and Rwanda. World Bank Publications.

Collier, P., Elliott, L., Hegre, H., Hoeffler, A., Reynal-Querol, M., & Sambanis, N. (2003). Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Collier, P., Hoeffler, A., & Soderbom, M. (2003). “On the Duration of Civil War.” Journal of Peace Research, 41(3), 253–273.

Collier, P., Hoeffler, A., & Söderbom, M. (2003). On the Duration of Civil War. Journal of Peace Research, 41(3), 253–273.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Fukushima, K. (2001). Sociology of Social Problems. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press.

Galtung, J. (1969). “Violence, Peace, and Peace Research.” Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191.

Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, Peace, and Peace Research. Journal of Peace Research, 6(3), 167–191.

Habibullah. (2019). Permasalahan Dan Prospek Jabatan Fungsional Pekerja Sosial Di Dinas Sosial Provinsi Jawa Tengah. SOSIO KONSEPSIA, 8, 227–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33007/ska.v8i3.1785

Hayner, P. (2011). Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions. New York: Routledge.

Hayner, P. B. (2011). Unspeakable Truths: Transitional Justice and the Challenge of Truth Commissions. New York: Routledge.

Irmayani, N. R. (2019). Diseminasi Hasil Penelitian Tahun 2019. Pusat Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Kesejahteraan Sosial. http://puslit.kemsos.go.id/berita/467/diseminasi-hasil-penelitian-tahun-2019#sthash.bIzdNZsJ.dpbs

Johnson, Herman. (2023). Exploring The Elements and Phases of Peacebuilding in Post-Conflict Communities in Negeria. Jalingo Journal of Social and Management Science. Volume 5, Number 1, Oktober 2023.

Katadata. (2023). Jumlah Konflik Sosial di Indonesia. Diakses dari https://databoks.katadata.co.id

Katadata. (2024). Jumlah Konflik Sosial di Indonesia Meningkat Awal 2024. Retrieved from https://databoks.katadata.co.id

Kementerian Perdagangan Republik Indonesia. (2017). Revitalisasi Pasar Tradisional: Strategi dan Implementasi. Jakarta: Kemendag.

Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

Maslow, A. H. (1943). A Theory of Human Motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Narayan, D. (2002). Empowerment and Poverty Reduction: A Sourcebook. Washington, DC: World Bank.

North, D. C., Wallis, J. J., & Weingast, B. R. (2009). Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nurhayati, S. (2020). "Tinjauan Sosial Ekonomi atas Perkembangan Pasar Modern dan Dampaknya pada Pasar Tradisional." Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Politik, 21(1), 44–55.

OECD. (2008). Concepts and Dilemmas of State Building in Fragile Situations. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press.

Setiawan, H. H. (2017, July 31). Paradigma Baru Bantuan Sosial. Kompas. https://kompas.id/baca/opini/2017/07/31/paradigma-baru-bantuan-sosial/

Simpson, L, M., Stahl, A, N., Francis, & Anderson, M. (2004). Reading and Learning Strategies: Recommendations for the 21st Century. Journal of Developmental Education, 28, 2–15.

Sphere Project. (2018). The Sphere Handbook: Humanitarian Charter and Minimum Standards in Humanitarian Response. Geneva: Sphere Association.

Stewart, F. (2008). Horizontal Inequalities and Conflict: Understanding Group Violence in Multiethnic Societies. Palgrave Macmillan.

Suwarno, P. (2015). Konflik Sosial di Pasar Tradisional: Studi Kasus Tata Kelola dan Ketimpangan Akses Ekonomi. Jurnal Sosiologi Masyarakat, 20(1), 55–72.

UNDP. (2008). Community-Based Approaches to Peacebuilding. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

UNDP. (2008). Post-Conflict Economic Recovery: Enabling Local Ingenuity. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

UNHCR. (2019). Handbook for Emergencies. Geneva: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

Varshney, A. (2002). Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Widodo, T. (2015). Dinamika Pasar Tradisional dan Pasar Modern dalam Perspektif Sosial Ekonomi. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia, 16(2), 115-128.

World Bank. (2011). World Development Report 2011: Conflict, Security, and Development. Washington, DC: World Bank.

Zastrow, C. (2010). Introduction to Social Work and Social Welfare: Empowering People (10th ed.). Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning

Downloads

Published

07-11-2025

How to Cite

Alfrojems, A. (2025). FUNGSI PASAR SEBAGAI KATALISATOR DALAM UPAYA RECOVERY PASCA KONFLIK SOSIAL : SUATU KAJIAN LITERATUR. Sosio Informa, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.31595/inf.v11i1.3385

Citation Check